The banal lacks substance and is superficial.
The etymology of banal takes us to the French language. The term is used as an adjective to describe that which lacks substance, is superficial or is insignificant .
For example: “I don't understand why you get angry over something so banal…” , “I'm already fed up with complex books and films for intellectuals: I want to dedicate my free time to more banal entertainment,” “After a few minutes of a “banal talk, the presidents decided to get fully into the matter.”
The little transcendental or lacking depth
The banal can be something everyday or not very important . Suppose a newspaper reports that a man stabbed another man after a “banal argument.” This qualifier refers to the fact that the reason for the conflict was inconsequential, although its consequences were serious (a physical attack with a knife).
The idea of banal is also used in opposition to what has depth ; that is, what requires a certain mental effort to understand its meaning or to interpret it. A literary critic, in this framework, can comment that a book revolves around a “banal theme,” alluding to the little substance of the topic it deals with.
a banal person
In the same way, we can indicate that, on many occasions, this adjective that concerns us now is used to refer to a person. Thus, it is said that this or that individual is someone banal. What this means is that it is a human being who does not have deep ideas, who does not value feelings, who always prefers superfluous things, who allows himself to be carried away only by the appearance of things and nothing more. .
This means that, in the same way, it is indicated that he only seeks consumerism, that what is most important to him is aesthetics and following fashion, that he spends all his time looking only for his comfort and that he does not hesitate to try to find continually your pleasure.
In that case we can establish that the person who is defined as banal is also identified with the adjectives of frivolous and superficial.
A banal person is frivolous and consumerist.
The concept in science
Within the world of science we have to highlight that the use of the adjective that we are now addressing is also used. Specifically, we talk about what are called banal microorganisms.
This is a term used to refer to microorganisms that have the particularity that they do not produce any type of disease. Of course, they are capable of altering the composition of an element if they act on it. Thus, for example, they can change the composition of any food.
The banality of evil
The concept of “banality of evil” , on the other hand, was developed by the philosopher Hannah Arendt after the trial that took place in Israel against the Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann . For Arendt , Eichmann was a person who did not analyze whether his actions were “bad” or “good” : nor did he care about their consequences. He limited himself to efficiently carrying out the orders dictated to him by his superiors, with the aim of advancing professionally.
The “banality of evil” can appear, according to the philosopher, when an individual limits himself to fulfilling his role in a system without thinking about the effects of his actions.